Russia Probe

In any argument that is being made ethos,pathos,and logos plays a role in it.Logos appeals to the logical point of view,pathos appeals to the audience's emotional side,and ethos appeals to the authority.In the Russia Probe videos Sarah Sanders,Tomi Lahrens,Mark Mazzetti,and Matt Apuzzo all uses one or more style to make their claim.

Sarah Sanders

She uses logos to make her argument that Russia is involved with the Clintons and the Democrats committee.In her video she even told Bill Hemmer that what she believed in is "based on facts and recent reporting".In her claim she was being biased,because she believes that president Trump is good and he is committed to protecting people retirement,mostly for the middle class.

Tomi Lahrens

Unlike Sarah Sanders,she appeals to the audience emotional point of view.She started off strong saying that "we are sick and tired of these corrupt politics wasting our time and money".She went even further to say "while hardworking Americans of all stripes are busting our humps to make a living,we've got swamp rats sucking us dry".The thought of that alone frustrates and disgusts her.

Mark Mazzetti

Like Sarah Sanders he utilizes logic.He believes that the Russia probe started with George Papadopaulous when he was drunk and spoke to Australia's top diplomat.

Matt Appuzzo

He uses first logic and then ethos when making his claim.His logic came from the leaked emails he read,to and from George Papadopaulous.Ethos came into play when he talked to the veteran counter intelligence,which makes his argument seem legit or credible.